Will FOD ever consider no sub no points again, stop all these (mostly) high rankers who make new names up almost everyday to see how high they can take that name or it's used to stalk to harass other players. Theres more players who sub now than when FOD first took away the points for non subs, how about making room 1&2 in every game subs only, and having only 1 room in each game where the non subs will have points. Or go back to the time where the non subs had no points, but now and then they get granted points for a period of time, but still keep them out of room 1 & 2...... Anyone agree ???
No sub no points
Posted in
Dear Moderators
No sub no points
I agree with you on pretty much all of this. While I somehow doubt FoD will ever consider it, having no points for subbed players would do the community a great deal of benefit. It would probably encourage more people to subscribe, and that's what the site wants - more revenue.
>having no points for subbed players would do the community a great deal of benefit. I take it your getting a bit mixed up,,, simple ?
Hmm, yeah I worded that completely wrongly. I know what I'm trying to say (I think;\), I just can't quite make it make sense.
Maybe if you had to have played for like a few months to get points, then people are less likely to be abusive as if they get banned, they have to play months again before they get to play for points again!
I think Army Members Only get points, is the best idea. Do any of the Mods have an opinion on this ? :|
>>>Şŋΐρέ >>>Posts:1,258 >>>Registered:Oct, 2003 >>> Re: NON-SUBS WITH RATINGS Posted:20-Dec-2003 20:22 >>> Reply >>>Ok... >>>There are players on FOD who have not paid to use the site. To try to get more people to pay FOD takes a list of all unsubed players that played the day befor and gives every 7th one on the list a rating .... Do you think we could go back to something like this idea? Maybe every 25Th unsubed player ? :|
how about non subs have to play for over a year then get points. so they then dont change there name every 5 minutes regards barrett 07
some teenagers who play dont have a credit card, lots of people say its the young who abuse, its the old as well so id keep things the way they are regards Mr Immortal [url=
http://imageshack.us
][img=
http://img107.imageshack.us/img107/8581/bugattiveyronoe9.jpg
]
/url]
ok, so ive been on for almost 5 years. i remember it all, and it wasn't cool. Back then i wasn't subbed. It wasn't fair for the people who were good but just registered. i mean nowadays 2 get on the top list u have 2 be subbed. there are many good subbed players, but there is probably a non-subbed who is better than the #1 on the top list.
i remenber being in snooker and bk-2 had crown but some non sub was higher, i think non subs should be in the top 20, this other guys name was something like \\\\\.\.\\. thats not it exactly regards Mr Immortal [url=
http://imageshack.us
][img=
http://img48.imageshack.us/img48/8559/bugattiveyronet3.jpg
]
/url]
Non subs should be in toplist?!? Sorry, but ain't that part of the privileges you get when subbing?:| It's not exactly costly to sub.
well Peter and for what its worth ..i agree with you ...no subs no Points would be a good idea ..and it would save Mods a lot of headaches with all the moans about it :p jk but i really do think its a good idea BC