2 THINGS
1. TOO SOON
2. THE WAY PPL PLAY, LIKE, USING ONE PERSON'S SCORE, WILL NOT CHANGE THE MATCH OR SOMETHING
FOR EXAMPLE, IF A PERSON WAS NOT REALLY GOOD LIKE THE OTHERS PLAYING....
SO, IF THIS PERSON WAS KILLED 30 TIMES, IT COULD AND WOULD AFFECT THE WHOLE TEAM
SO, I HAVE 2 IDEAS
1. THIS IDEA IS THE RATIO ONE, FOR EXAMPLE, A TEAM HAS 2 3 AND 5 PLACE, YOU GET ALL THE SCORES OF THE PLAYERS IN ONE TEAM THAT KILLED THE OTHER, AND DIVIDE BY THE TIMES THE PLAYERS IN THIS TEAM DIED, IT WOULD GIVE A RATIO, SOMETHING LIKE 1.???, OR IF THE DYING PERCENTAGE IS HIGHER, THAN IT THE RATIO WILL BE BELOW 1.00...
LIKE, 56/56 IS A 1.00 RATIO
2/4 IS A .50 RATIO
THATS ONE IDEA TO MAKE THE THINGS MUCH MORE FAIR
2. EASIER ONE, PLAY FOR A AMOUNT OF MINUTES, FOR EXAMPLE, 30...THAN, WHEN THE TIME IS DONE, A PERSON SEES THE POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE POINTS OF A TEAM, FOR EXAMPLE, IF ALL THE POINTS OF ONE TEAM ADDS UP TO 50/40, THE POSITIVE POINTS ARE 10...ANOTHER EXAMPLE, IF A TEAM'S SCORE ADDS UP TO 41/51, THEIR POINTS ARE NEGATIVE BY 10 POINTS..SO IT MEANS THAT THIS TEAM LOST
THIS IS REALLY OBVIOUS STUFF, BUT, SOME PEOPLE MIGHT NOT HAVE NOTICED IT CUZ IT WAS TOO SIMPLE.....
THE IDEA OF TAKING THE POINTS OF ONE PLAYER, ITS NOT FAIR....
