> I DONT THINK U UNDERSTAND THE POINT FLY OR DIE, > MYSELF AND HAZE PAY FOR OUR RATINGS AND WHEN A LOTTO > WINNER WINS WE LOSE HEAVILY, NOW LETS SAY THAT THE > LOTTO WINNER NEVER REGISTERS, THEN THERES NO NEED FOR > HIM TO HAVE A RATING NOT TO MENTION WE WILL CONTINUE > TO LOSE RATINGS TO PLAYERS WHO WILL NEVER REGISTER. > NOW IF YOU TELL ME THATS FAIR THEN THATS EXACTLY THE > REASON I DIDN'T SIGN UP FOR THE YEAR. AS HAZE WILL > AGREE WITH ME, WHY SHOULD WE PAY FOR RATINGS TO BE > QUASHED BY LOTTO WINNERS, YES WE HAVE OTHER FEATURES > I KNOW, BUT AS WILL YOU THE RATING AS A MAJOR PART OF > THE SUBSCRIPTION THEREFORE WE FEEL THAT OUR RATINGS > SHOULD NOT GO DOWN BECAUSE OF LOTTO WINNERS. > END RESULT IS WE WONT PLAY LOTTO WINNERS, SO THEY > HAVE TO PLAY THEMSELVES SO THE POINT OF ALL THE > CHANGES IS LOST. > WHY DONT YOU MAKE IT SO PAID PLAYERS RATINGS ONLY GO > DOWN IF THE LOST TO A PAID PLAYER?