I find it extremely insulting that people who have been using inapropriate behaviour on FOD and have been given a demerit are entitled to a crown. Why should this happen and people who have had demerits/demerit in past are not entitled to V.I.P. I also find having a crown a priviledge, Pool Guruâ¢;)
Crown With Demerit
Posted in
Billiards
Crown With Demerit
well even though they have a demerit they still earned the crown.. think thats the way site owners would look at it, but i also agree with you that it should be same with crown as the system tourneys.. if you've had a ban/dem you shouldnt hold it
yes, they are both earned for and priviledges, that's what i am trying to say, Thanks for giving me your opinion;) Pool Guru™
i dont agree with u 2,it doesnt mean that someone who has had a demerit shouldnt be holding the crown.what happens then if someone gets a demerit when for example he has just entered the site lets say years ago and he was just fooling around.after all that time he could have easily changed dont you agree? and after all,skill doesnt go together with behaviour
i agree billiard, but most of people who do have crown jus do it most of time coz sum1's run or they lost points.. and by the way skill does sometimes go with behaviour.. but not on a level like an internet pool site :p
Paying members should not be discriminated against in because of demerits, especially when they are sometimes given without good cause. The "loose" discrection of one person can affect the enjoyment of another too easily.