FlyOrDie.com
« Back to All Topics
"An-passant's" absence of logic
Posted in 
Chess
"An-passant's" absence of logic
Posted in 
Chess
"An-passant's" absence of logic
I have read the "an passeant" rule few times, but I can find the logic on it. All the chess "eats" happens with one block (don't if it's how you say it, maybe pieces) moving to another's house. So one of the chess's blocks is eliminated from the tableland when is attacked from another block that assumes his house. I don't understand why the need of this rule that deny the chess's logic of eliminating blocks.
En Passant isn't really that complicated.


Let's say, you have a Pawn that is still in the same position you start on. And let's say, your opponent moved one of his Pawn's up, to take it within the next two turns. Well, you decide you want to prevent that, and move up your 2 spaces. He then moves to the square under your Pawn, just like if you had landed right before him. Bare in mind, he can 
only
 do that on his turn right after you move up two spaces, if he doesn't you are safe.
I think he understands how to perform en passant, he just doesn't get why this move allows players to "side step" if you like, instead of moving to the position of the taken piece.

I'm no expert on this, but it seems to me this move is to compensate for the fact that a pawn moving from it's inital position can move two spaces. If an opposition pawn is in place to use en passant, then, effectively, the moving pawn has jumped past the opposition pawn. 

In the game that is an unfair advantage. It allows defending pawns to simply walk past an attacking pawn. I think en passant is simply a compromise to negate an unfair advantage.
It's allowed in tournaments, and adds more strategy to the game. I see no problem with the logic to it, because a Pawn is basically the weakest piece and therefore "inferior" to a normal soldier.


Also think of it like this.


Your racing someone, your on rocks they are the smooth road. Your coming upbeside them, running the opposite way. He falls right beside you, are you gonna stay on your rough road if the rules state are allowed to switch positions if your opponent falls?
I don't get why so many people don't understand En-pessant. It is spelt with an E by the way not an A. I think it is french for "in passing"

It works like the people ^^^^ said. Something funny is that if you play an oponnent that has only heard of the rule but doesn't understand it you can cheat the game around. ^_^
lol yeah, that is the funny part about it. People never understood how helpful it can be in some situations. Sometimes it even makes me hesitate to move up two spaces, allowing them the chance to perform En Passant.
In the original game of chess, pawns could only move one square. Allowing them to move two on the first go speeds up the opening, BUT en passant means that it doesn't give an advantage - you can take pawns as if they had only moved one square like in the old game.
Languages
English
English
azərbaycan
Azerbaijani
bosanski
Bosnian
čeština
Czech
Cymraeg
Welsh
dansk
Danish
Deutsch
German
eesti
Estonian
English
English
español
Spanish
euskara
Basque
français
French
hrvatski
Croatian
Indonesia
Indonesian
isiZulu
Zulu
íslenska
Icelandic
italiano
Italian
latviešu
Latvian
lietuvių
Lithuanian
magyar
Hungarian
Malti
Maltese
Melayu
Malay
Nederlands
Dutch
norsk
Norwegian
o‘zbek
Uzbek
polski
Polish
português
Portuguese
português (Brasil)
Portuguese (Brazil)
română
Romanian
shqip
Albanian
slovenčina
Slovak
slovenščina
Slovenian
suomi
Finnish
svenska
Swedish
Tagalog
Tagalog
Tiếng Việt
Vietnamese
Türkçe
Turkish
Vlaams
Flemish
Võro
Võro language
Ελληνικά
Greek
български
Bulgarian
кыргызча
Kyrgyz
русский
Russian
српски
Serbian
українська
Ukrainian
עברית
Hebrew
العربية
Arabic
فارسی
Persian
हिन्दी
Hindi
ไทย
Thai
ქართული
Georgian
日本語
Japanese
正體中文
Chinese (Taiwan)
简体中文
Chinese (China)
한국어
Korean